feat: using newer Neo4j lib version! #24
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@amindadgar has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 12 minutes and 6 seconds before requesting another review. How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughThe changes include an update to the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (3)
- requirements.txt (1 hunks)
- setup.py (1 hunks)
- tc_analyzer_lib/metrics/heatmaps/heatmaps.py (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- requirements.txt
- setup.py
Additional comments not posted (4)
tc_analyzer_lib/metrics/heatmaps/heatmaps.py (4)
84-84: Revised Calculation ofmax_indexNeeds VerificationThe change in the calculation of
max_indexfrom(analytics_date - datetime.now()).daysto(datetime.now() - analytics_date).daysreverses the direction of the difference. This adjustment could potentially affect the loop's execution, especially in scenarios whereanalytics_dateis later than the current date. It's crucial to verify that this change aligns with the intended functionality of the heatmap generation process.Please ensure that this change has been tested thoroughly, especially in edge cases where the
analytics_datemight be equal to or later than the current date.
Line range hint
183-255: Well-Structured Hourly Analytics ProcessingThe
_process_hourly_analyticsmethod is well-structured and effectively handles various types of analytics, both predefined and custom. The use of asynchronous operations and clear separation of concerns within the method are commendable.
Line range hint
257-314: Consistent and Robust Raw Analytics ProcessingThe
_process_raw_analyticsmethod is consistent with the_process_hourly_analyticsmethod in terms of structure and handling of analytics. The error handling for missingactivity_namein custom analytics configurations is appropriately managed, ensuring robustness in analytics processing.
Line range hint
316-389: Effective Initialization of Heatmap DocumentsThe
_init_heatmaps_documentsmethod effectively prepares heatmap documents for storage. The method's handling of data restructuring and filtering of bot activities is crucial for ensuring the accuracy and relevance of the heatmap data.
more efficiently query running.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Chores
tc-neo4j-libandtc-analyzer-libto ensure compatibility and access to the latest features.